Palatine Tonsil Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Pregnancy: Case Report

Introduction

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common and aggressive subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), encompassing a heterogeneous group of malignancies with distinct clinical, morphological, and genetic features.1 2 3 4 It accounts for 30 to 40% of NHL cases in developed countries,4 it occurs predominantly in men aged ≥ 60 years,5 6 and it is rare during pregnancy.7 8 Highly invasive, DLBCL produces bulky nodal and extranodal masses, involving multiple organs.9 10 The reported risk factors include genetic alterations, autoimmune disorders, viral and bacterial infections, lifestyle, and environmental or occupational exposures.6 11 12

Despite its aggressive nature, DLBCL is often curable in the early stages, and it shows a favorable response to standard immunochemotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) administered in 21-day cycles.13 Approximately 60% of the patients achieve long-term remission, whereas 30 to 40% are refractory cases or cases of relapse, requiring alternative therapeutic approaches.14 15

Management during pregnancy and the postpartum period presents additional challenges due to risks for the mother and infant. Chemotherapy during lactation is generally contraindicated, as agents such as cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, methotrexate, and doxorubicin are excreted in breast milk and may cause severe neonatal adverse effects, including neutropenia.16 17

We herein report a rare case of DLBCL of the palatine tonsil (PT) diagnosed on the seventh postpartum day in a patient with a twin delivery. We describe the staging process using immunohistochemical and molecular techniques, as well as the personalized immunochemotherapy regimen employed.

The present study was approved by the institutional Ethics in Research Committee (under CAAE: 88511825.7.0000.5475).

Case Description

A 37-year-old Caucasian woman delivered twins by cesarean section at 35 weeks. She was lactating when she was referred in August 2020 to NAIC – Instituto do Câncer, located in the municipality of Bauru, state of São Paulo, Brazil, with a diagnosis of high-grade PT lymphoma established by incisional biopsy on the seventh postpartum day.

On the initial onco-hematology evaluation, the patient reported a 2-month history of right PT enlargement and night sweats, with no fever, weight loss, or significant personal or family history. The physical examination revealed a right PT mass, without palpable peripheral lymphadenopathy. Her general condition was good, with a score of 0 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Scale of Performance Status (PS).

The baseline workup included complete laboratory tests (including viral serologies relevant to lymphoma), transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), bone-marrow biopsy with immunohistochemistry (IHC), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) immunophenotyping, repeat PT biopsy review, and staging 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). The laboratory tests and TTE were within normal limits.

The initial IHC of the PT biopsy suggested an unclassified B-cell lymphoma with intermediate features between DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma (BL). Additional IHC and molecular studies were performed, confirming a diagnosis of DLBCL of the germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype, with expression of BCL6 and MYC. The positivity for Ki-67 was of 100%, and the tumor cells were also positive for CD20, CD10, BCL6, and MYC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed no MYC gene rearrangement (locus 8q24), but it was positive for BCL2 (locus 18q21) and BCL6 (locus 3q27) rearrangements.

Staging PET/CT demonstrated marked enlargement and hypermetabolism of the right PT (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax]: 25.5), with additional uptake in bilateral level-IIa and right level-III cervical lymph nodes (largest: 1.4 × 1.0 cm; SUVmax: 4.7). The final diagnosis was stage-IIBE DLBCL, CD20-positive, of the GCB immunophenotype, FISH negative for MYC rearrangement, but positive for BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements.

Treatment was initiated 17 days after the initial biopsy result, consisting of 6 cycles of R-CHOP administered every 21 days, combined with intrathecal prophylactic chemotherapy (methotrexate, cytarabine, dexamethasone). Breastfeeding was discontinued prior to treatment. All cycles were completed without complications, with only mild headache reported as an adverse effect.

After 3 cycles, interim PET/CT (iPET/CT) showed asymmetry PT uptake (right SUVmax: 4.5; left: 8.6) and minimal uptake in a left level-IIa cervical lymph node (size: 1.3 × 0.5 cm; SUVmax: 2.4). According to the Deauville and SUVmax criteria, the patient achieved complete response (CR). Subsequent treatment cycles proceeded uneventfully. End-of-treatment PET/CT confirmed CR. The patient has remained disease-free during 60 months of follow-up.

Discussion

During pregnancy and the postpartum period, NHL is rare.18 19 We herein report a case of stage-IIBE DLBCL of the GCB subtype, diagnosed during the first postpartum week and located in the PT, an uncommon extranodal site.19 20 21 The literature8 suggests that lymphomas progress more rapidly after delivery, which highlights the importance of rapid diagnosis and timely initiation of therapy. In the patient herein reported, aggressive disease biology (Ki-67 = 100%) created an immediate risk of airway obstruction, making expedited staging and treatment initiation essential.

Diagnostic accuracy was achieved through the integration of IHC, FISH, and molecular profiling. While IHC raised concern for double-hit lymphoma due to BCL6 and MYC expression, FISH excluded MYC rearrangement and confirmed BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements only. This careful diagnostic pathway enabled a precise classification as DLBCL of the GCB subtype and informed the decision to administer R-CHOP chemotherapy rather than more intensive regimens.

A critical aspect of this case was the patient's postpartum and lactation status. Rituximab and most cytotoxic chemotherapy agents are known to be excreted in breast milk, posing significant risks to infants, including immunosuppression, cytopenia, and potential long-term toxicity.1 2 16 17 In accordance with international guidelines,16 breastfeeding was discontinued prior to the initiation of therapy to ensure neonatal safety. Chemotherapy during lactation is generally contraindicated, as agents such as cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, methotrexate, and doxorubicin have been detected in breast milk and are associated with severe adverse outcomes in infants, particularly neutropenia.22 23 24 Therefore, most sources21 recommend avoiding breastfeeding during maternal antineoplastic therapy. Although some studies have suggested that breastfeeding may be feasible during intermittent chemotherapy if an appropriate abstinence period is observed, this remains controversial. Early recommendations proposed an abstinence interval of 6 to 10 days,23 but more recent pharmacokinetic modeling under worst-case scenarios24 suggests that a minimum of 6 days may be sufficient to minimize systemic and gastrointestinal toxicity after the colostral phase. For mothers who wish to preserve lactation, milk expression can be performed throughout treatment; however, the expressed milk must be discarded. Breastfeeding can only be safely resumed after the complete clearance of cytotoxic agents from the maternal body, a process that generally requires 60 to 90 days following the last chemotherapy cycle, depending on the pharmacokinetics of the drugs used.24 These considerations highlight the importance of multidisciplinary counseling in postpartum oncology care, ensuring effective cancer management and neonatal safety.

A major concern during the postpartum period, when the immune system faces profound challenges, is the risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapse following the R-CHOP treatment. This risk is particularly relevant due to the anatomical proximity and the nature of lymphoid tissue in the Waldeyer's ring, where the PTs are located, an anatomical site considered to be at high risk for CNS involvement.25 26 27 28 Although CNS relapse is relatively uncommon, with reported incidence rates ranging from 5 to 25% depending on specific risk factors, it is almost invariably fatal. Among patients with extranodal disease, the incidence is reported to be between 2 and 10%.29 30 Central nervous system relapse is a devastating complication that most often occurs within the first year after R-CHOP therapy in patients with DLBCL, with survival typically limited to 2 to 6 months.31 These poor outcomes have prompted substantial efforts to develop strategies to prevent this complication.

In the case herein reported, although the patient was considered low-risk according to the Ann Arbor staging system and had a score of 0 on the CNS International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) for DLBCL, the decision was made to administer prophylactic intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy during the postpartum phase. This approach aimed to minimize the likelihood of lymphoma infiltration into the CNS, given the unique immunological context of the puerperium.32 The prophylactic regimen consisted of methotrexate (MTX), cytarabine, and dexamethasone administered via the IT route. This route of administration ensures direct drug delivery into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), thereby maintaining therapeutic concentrations.33 Cytarabine plays a critical role by sustaining elevated drug levels in the CSF for periods exceeding 14 days.33 Although MTX is well known for its potential toxicity, the adverse effects in the present case were minimal, with only grade-1 headache reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.32 33

Treatment monitoring with interim PET/CT after 3 cycles confirmed complete metabolic response, a predictor of long-term survival in DLBCL;34 35 at 60 months of follow-up, the patient remains in complete remission.

The case herein reported demonstrates that postpartum DLBCL, though rare, requires urgent diagnosis and individualized therapy. Key clinical lessons include the need to discontinue breastfeeding to prevent infant exposure to toxicity drugs, and the value of considering CNS prophylaxis in extranodal disease involving the Waldeyer's ring, even, when the standard risk scores are low. The favorable long-term outcome in this patient highlights the importance of precise molecular diagnostics, multidisciplinary coordination, and tailored treatment strategies in the management of lymphoma in the postpartum setting.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Authors

About the Journal

Journal: Brazilian Journal of Oncology

DOI: 10.1055/s-00059887

e-issn: 2526-8732

Publisher: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.

Publisher address: Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

No citations found for this article.

References

1. Chen, B J and Fend, F and Campo, E and Quintanilla-Martinez, L. Aggressive B-cell lymphomas—from morphology to molecular pathogenesis. Ann Lymphoma [online]. 2019, vol. 3, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.21037/aol.2018.12.02 Ver referência

2. Alaggio, R and Amador, C and Anagnostopoulos, I. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms. Leukemia [online]. 2022, vol. 36, p. 1720-1748. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2 Ver referência

3. Campo, E and Jaffe, E S and Cook, J R. The International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms: a report from the Clinical Advisory Committee. Blood [online]. 2022, vol. 140, p. 1229-1253. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2022015851 Ver referência

4. Silkenstedt, E and Salles, G and Campo, E and Dreyling, M. B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Lancet [online]. 2024, vol. 403, p. 1791-1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02705-8 Ver referência

5. Salvaro, M M and Justo, M D and Frassetto, M D. Análise epidemiológica das internações por linfoma não-Hodgkin no Brasil. Hematol Transfus Ther [online]. 2021, vol. 43, p. S498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2021.10.858 Ver referência

6. Sehn, L H and Salles, G. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med [online]. 2021, vol. 384, p. 842-858. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2027612 Ver referência

7. Brenner, B and Avivi, I and Lishner, M. Haematological cancers in pregnancy. Lancet [online]. 2012, vol. 379, p. 580-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61348-2 Ver referência

8. Sampaio, L S and Silva, L S and Castro, L CS. Linfoma difuso de grandes células B no período gestacional. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther [online]. 2024, vol. 46, p. S269-S1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2024.09.451 Ver referência

9. Wright, D H. Lymphomas of Waldeyer's ring. Histopathology [online]. 1994, vol. 24, p. 97-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1994.tb01281.x Ver referência

10. Liu, Y and Barta, S K. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. Am J Hematol [online]. 2019, vol. 94, p. 604-616. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.25460 Ver referência

11. Thandra, K C and Barsouk, A and Saginala, K and Padala, S A and Barsouk, A and Rawla, P. Epidemiology of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Med Sci (Basel) [online]. 2021, vol. 9, p. 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci9010005 Ver referência

12. Luo, J and Craver, A and Bahl, K. Etiology of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A review from epidemiologic studies. J Natl Cancer Cent [online]. 2022, vol. 2, p. 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jncc.2022.08.003 Ver referência

13. Sehn, L H and Donaldson, J and Chhanabhai, M. Introduction of combined CHOP plus rituximab therapy dramatically improved outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in British Columbia. J Clin Oncol [online]. 2005, vol. 23, p. 5027-5033. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.09.137 Ver referência

14. Cheson, B D and Nowakowski, G and Salles, G. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: new targets and novel therapies. Blood Cancer J [online]. 2021, vol. 11, p. 68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-021-00456-w Ver referência

15. Nastoupil, L J and Bartlett, N L. Navigating the Evolving Treatment Landscape of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol [online]. 2023, vol. 41, p. 903-913. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.01848 Ver referência

16. BSR and BHPR Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group. BSR and BHPR guideline on prescribing drugs in pregnancy and breastfeeding-Part I: standard and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and corticosteroids. Rheumatology (Oxford) [online]. 2016, vol. 55, p. 1693-1697. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev404 Ver referência

17. Arup, G and Shravan, N. Cancer and Pregnancy in the Post-Roe v. Wade Era: A Comprehensive Review. Curr Oncol [online]. 2023, vol. 30, p. 9448-9457. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30110684 Ver referência

18. Lishner, M and Avivi, I and Apperley, J F. Hematologic Malignancies in Pregnancy: Management Guidelines From an International Consensus Meeting. J Clin Oncol [online]. 2016, vol. 34, p. 501-508. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.4445 Ver referência

19. Carvalho, C M and Cândido, E B and Furtado, R S and Almeida, J V and Silva, A L. Aspectos clínicos do câncer durante o período gestacional: desafios diagnósticos e terapêuticos. Femina [online]. 2022, vol. 50, p. 582-588.

20. Bergamini, C and Cavalieri, S and Resteghini, C. Multidisciplinary management of pregnancy-associated and early post-partum head and neck cancer patients. Front Oncol [online]. 2023, vol. 13, p. 1298439. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1298439 Ver referência

21. Özdemir, Ç and Eryeğen, N and Yavaşoğlu, F. Clinicopatological Examination of Waldeyer's Ring Lymphomas: A Cross-Sectional Study in Turkey. Baun Health Sci J [online]. 2023, vol. 12, p. 81-88. https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1241429 Ver referência

22. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed) [Internet]. , 2006.

23. Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. ABM Clinical Protocol #34: Breast Cancer and Breastfeeding. Breastfeed Med [online]. 2020, vol. 15, p. 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2020.29157.hmj Ver referência

24. Damoiseaux, D and Calpe, S and Rosing, H. Presence of Five Chemotherapeutic Drugs in Breast Milk as a Guide for the Safe Use of Chemotherapy During Breastfeeding: Results From a Case Series. Clin Pharmacol Ther [online]. 2022, vol. 112, p. 404-410. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2626 Ver referência

25. Qi, S N and Li, Y X and Wang, H. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: clinical characterization and prognosis of Waldeyer ring versus lymph node presentation. Cancer [online]. 2009, vol. 115, p. 4980-4989. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24557 Ver referência

26. Teh, C S and Jayalakshmi, P and Chong, S Y. Waldeyer ring lymphoma: a case series. Ear Nose Throat J [online]. 2014, vol. 93, p. E22-E25. https://doi.org/10.1177/014556131409300905 Ver referência

27. Singh, R and Shaik, S and Negi, B S. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A review. J Family Med Prim Care [online]. 2020, vol. 9, p. 1834-1840. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1037_19 Ver referência

28. Köseoğlu, F D and Demir, D and Çınar, E. Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of The Tonsil: Clinical Features, Treatment Response and Prognosis. Ege J Med [online]. 2024, vol. 63, p. 86-95. https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1375716 Ver referência

29. British Society of Haematology. The prevention of central nervous system relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a British Society for Haematology good practice paper. Br J Haematol [online]. 2020, vol. 190, p. 708-714. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16866 Ver referência

30. Chua, B JG and Low, C E and Yau, C E. Recent updates on central nervous system prophylaxis in patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Exp Hematol Oncol [online]. 2024, vol. 13, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-023-00467-2 Ver referência

31. Eyre, T A and Djebbari, F and Kirkwood, A A and Collins, G P. Efficacy of central nervous system prophylaxis with stand-alone intrathecal chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the rituximab era: a systematic review. Haematologica [online]. 2020, vol. 105, p. 1914-1924. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.229948 Ver referência

32. Al-Banaa, K and Alshaikhli, A and Poudel, S. . [online]. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2023-186844 Ver referência

33. GELTAMO group. Central nervous system prophylaxis with intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in a subset of high-risk patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving first line systemic therapy in a prospective trial. Ann Hematol [online]. 2016, vol. 95, p. 893-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-016-2648-4 Ver referência

34. Rekowski, J and Hüttmann, A and Schmitz, C. [object Object]. J Nucl Med [online]. 2021, vol. 62, p. 37-42. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.244145 Ver referência

35. Estratificação de risco em linfoma difuso de grandes células B. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter [online]. 2006, vol. 28, p. 296-300. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-84842006000400016 Ver referência

Article images

See where this article was accessed

Dados de acesso insuficientes para visualização no mapa.