A marked decline in the colorectal cancer (CRC) burden was observed in the twentieth century,
Many hereditary cancer syndromes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of CRC; however, most cases are sporadic.
Ubiquitin ligases (E3) are proteins involved in cellular responses to environmental stress and DNA damage, including the regulation of apoptotic pathways.
Recent studies
The present study aimed to compare the immunohistochemical expression of parkin and APC in colorectal polyps and adenocarcinomas.
We performed an observational cross-sectional study using data collected from Hospital Santa Cruz and Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná (HC-UFPR), both located in the city of Curitiba, state of Paraná, Brazil. The study was approved by the Ethics in Research Committee of HC-UFPR (registered under no. 820.432, dated August 25, 2014), and informed consent was waived for all individuals included in the analysis.
We obtained clinicopathological data from patients older than 18 years of age who underwent endoscopic polypectomy for neoplastic polyps at Hospital Santa Cruz in 2008 used in previous studies,
The clinical data were obtained from medical records stored in the hospital database. All pathological samples were obtained from the Pathology Department of HC-UFPR.
We collected clinical data on age, sex, number of polyps, and diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Age was stratified into 3 groups according to the Bethesda classification:
The pathological data included polyp/adenocarcinoma laterality, morphology, size, histology, grade, and immunohistochemical markers. Histological slides were analyzed by a pathologist with experience in gastrointestinal pathology for a diagnostic review.
We analyzed laterality as a dichotomous variable. Therefore, the right-colon neoplasms included appendiceal, cecal, ascending, hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon neoplasms; and left-colon neoplasms included the distal transverse colon, splenic flexure, descending, sigmoid, rectosigmoid junction, and rectum (upper, middle and lower) neoplasms. We opted for this distribution following the current knowledge that right-sided colon lesions present distinct biological, epidemiological, and pathological characteristics, and usually a worse prognosis compared to left-sided colon cancers.
The polyps were classified according to morphology into low-dysplasia adenomas (LDAs), high-dysplasia adenomas (HDAs), sessile-serrated polyps (SSPs), and hyperplastic polyps (HPs). The polyps and adenocarcinomas were stratified into low- and high-grade lesions. The expression of the parkin and APC proteins was determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides.
Tissue microarray (TMA) construction was performed at the Laboratory of Experimental Pathology of Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR). We used archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues to obtain cores measuring 3 mm in diameter. Histological slides were used to select areas with a better representation of the neoplastic tissue. The cores were then transferred to a recipient TMA paraffin block. Microsections were cut from the block to prepare hematoxylin-eosin and IHC slides. For the IHC, the slides were subjected to antigen retrieval with the Target Retrieval Solution (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and then incubated with the following monoclonal antibodies: antiparkin antibody (mouse; 1:100; Abcam Limited, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and anti-APC antibody (mouse; 1:200; Abcam Limited). A disclosure polymer (Spring Bioscience Corp., Pleasanton, CA, United States) was used as a secondary antibody. Slides were incubated with the diaminobenzidine complex and substrate and then counterstained with Harris hematoxylin. Positive and negative controls were included in the IHC analysis for each antibody. The slides were analyzed by an experienced pathologist.
Parkin and APC protein expression was evaluated according to IHC using color morphometry, a quantitative technique that describes the area of protein expression in square micrometers (µm2). For each slide, 3 pictures from each of the 4 image-wide fields were obtained. A BX40 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 40× magnification objective lens and a Dino Eye camera (AnMo Electronics Corporation, Hsinchu City, Taiwan) using DinoCapture 2.0 software (AnMo Electronics Corporation) was used for image capture. The images were optimized using the Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA, United States) software, version 13.0, by removing the stroma, mucin lakes, and white areas. The remaining regions of interest were then analyzed using the Image-Pro Plus (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MA, United States) software with a color morphometric tool using a high-power field (HPF).
Fig. 1 Morphometric analysis of colorectal polyps (x40 magnification). (A) Parkin immunoexpression; (B) APC immunoexpression; (A1,B1) Image optimized with the Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Incorporated) software, version 13.0, after removal of non-interest areas (stroma and mucin lakes), represented in white; (A2,B2) morphometric processing with the representation of non-interest areas in green, areas without protein expression, in yellow, and immunopositivity for immunohistochemical staining, in red.
Fig. 2 Morphometric analysis of colorectal adenocarcinomas (x40 magnification). (A) Parkin immunoexpression; (B) APC immunoexpression; (A1,B1) Image optimized with the Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Incorporated) software, version 13.0, after removal of non-interest areas (stroma and mucin lakes), represented in white; (A2,B2) morphometric processing with the representation of non-interest areas in green, areas without protein expression, in yellow, and immunopositivity for immunohistochemical staining, in red.
Considering that several patients contributed to the study sample with more than one polyp, it was necessary to analyze them within a statistical model that considered the hierarchical data structure to avoid possible analysis biases. To assess the association between clinicopathological parameters and IHC expression, we used a univariate multilevel linear regression model in which polyps were defined as level 1, and patients, as level 2. The significance of the variables was assessed using the Wald test, and the results were presented in terms of coefficient variables within 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). The intraclass correlation coefficient was estimated to assess the composition of the variations in the markers. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to assess the associations among quantitative variables. The Student's t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare IHC markers between the groups. The Student's t-test, the Fisher's exact test, and the Chi-squared test were used for the comparison of groups defined by polyps and adenocarcinomas. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Data were analyzed using the Stata (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, United States) software, version 14.
We included 295 individuals, 222 (75.2%) of whom underwent polypectomy for neoplastic polyps, and 73 (24.7%) underwent colorectal cancer surgery for adenocarcinoma. The clinical characteristics of the sample are summarized in
| Polyp group (N = 222) | Adenocarcinoma group (N = 73) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 122 | 55 | 34 | 46.6 |
| Female | 100 | 45 | 39 | 53.4 |
| Age groups (years) | ||||
| ≤ 45 | 45 | 20.3 | 13 | 17.8 |
| 46–55 | 58 | 26.1 | 12 | 16.4 |
| ≥ 56 | 119 | 53.6 | 48 | 65.8 |
| Number of polyps | ||||
| 1 | 100 | 45 | ||
| > 1 | 122 | 55 | ||
| Polyps (N = 284) | Adenocarcinomas (N = 73) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | |
| Location | ||||
| Right colon | 121 | 42.6 | 18 | 24.7 |
| Left colon | 163 | 57.4 | 55 | 75.3 |
| Grade | ||||
| Low | 262 | 92.3 | 64 | 87.7 |
| High | 22 | 7.7 | 8 | 10.9 |
| Unknown | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.1 |
| Size (mm) | ||||
| < 4 | 68 | 23.9 | ||
| 4–10 | 186 | 65.5 | ||
| > 10 | 30 | 10.6 | ||
| Morphology | ||||
| Pediculate | 27 | 9.5 | ||
| Sessile | 257 | 90.5 | ||
| Histology | ||||
| LGA | 192 | 67.6 | ||
| SSP | 25 | 8.8 | ||
| HGD | 22 | 7.7 | ||
| HP | 45 | 15.8 | ||
Abbreviations: HGD, high-grade dysplasia; HP, hyperplastic polyp; LGA, low-grade adenoma; SSP, sessile serrated polyp.
Parkin and APC expression in high- and low-grade polyps and adenocarcinomas is shown in
| Mean | Median | SD | p | cLGP | cHGP | cLGA | cHGA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parkin | ||||||||
| LGP (n = 262) | 10.4 | 9.6 | 6.1 | < 0.001* | – | 0.217 | < 0.001* | 0.039* |
| HGP (n = 22) | 12.2 | 11.3 | 6.1 | 0.217 | – | 0.005* | 0.258 | |
| LGA (n = 64) | 16.8 | 15.1 | 8.6 | < 0.001* | 0.005* | – | 0.549 | |
| HGA (n = 8) | 15.3 | 19.8 | 8.4 | 0.039* | 0.258 | 0.549 | – | |
| APC | ||||||||
| LGP (n = 240) | 18.8 | 18.3 | 7.3 | < 0.001* | – | 0.608 | < 0.001* | < 0.001* |
| HGP (n = 17) | 20 | 19.6 | 7.8 | 0.608 | – | < 0.001* | 0.001* | |
| LGA (n = 64) | 32.4 | 31.6 | 14 | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | – | 0.817 | |
| HGA (n = 8) | 33.2 | 34.6 | 16.5 | < 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.817 | – |
Abbreviations: c, p-value when compared with; HGA, high-grade adenocarcinoma; HGP, High-grade polyp; LGA, low-grade adenocarcinoma; LGP, low-grade polyp; SD, standard deviation. Note: * p < 0.05 (analysis of variance, ANOVA).
The results of the univariate multilevel linear regression for the comparison of protein expression showed that adenocarcinomas had a significantly higher expression of parkin (6.19; 95%CI: 4.43–9.95; p < 0.001) (
Fig. 3 Multilevel analysis of the combined effect of polyp/adenocarcinoma and the degree of differentiation of (A) parkin protein and (B) APC protein, showing in both graphics a significant (p < 0.001) lower expression in low- and high-grade polyps compared with adenocarcinomas. We can also observe a higher expression of parkin in high-grade polyps and in low-grade adenocarcinomas, as well as a higher expression of APC in high-grade polyps and adenocarcinomas.
We demonstrated a significant correlation between parkin and APC expressions in polyps and adenocarcinomas. Previous research
This positive correlation was also found in another study
In addition, we observed a higher immunoexpression of parkin and APC in (high- and low-grade) adenocarcinomas than in polyps (with high- and low-grade dysplasia). There are no previous studies showing overexpression of such proteins in adenocarcinomas compared with neoplastic polyps. This suggests that, as a neoplastic polyp dedifferentiates toward the formation of adenocarcinoma, the expressions of parkin and APC increase, in contrast to what we initially expected. As both are products of tumor suppressor genes, when mutated, we expected that they would favor neoplastic evolution, thus being expressed in progressively smaller amounts. However, this assumption was not confirmed by the results observed. In fact, after the multilevel analysis with four subgroups of polyps and carcinomas, we confirmed that there was a greater expression of parkin and APC in the group of adenocarcinomas than in the polyp groups. Likewise, when analyzing the multilevel hierarchical structure for APC immunoexpression, a higher expression of this protein was identified in polyps, which is expected in the classic pathway of the carcinogenesis model. Thus, corroborating previous findings,
Another alternative is that parkin mediates mitochondrial mitophagy. Mitochondrial damage caused by changes in tumor cells can lead to increased generation of reactive oxygen species and alterations in membrane potential. Parkin ensures mitochondrial homeostasis by inducing mitophagy in damaged mitochondria through an increase in the BAX/BCL-2 ratio. Thus, it protects cells from apoptosis and contributes to cell viability and consequent tumor progression.
However, it is important to note that the immunohistochemical analysis performed did not enable us to investigate whether the expressed protein was functional. Additional studies are needed to identify the functionality of this protein.
Therefore, we conclude that parkin and APC have a similar biological behavior in tumor suppression, but with a tendency towards a “de novo” increase in their expression as the neoplastic cell advances in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. These findings indicate that parkin and APC may be involved in the late mechanisms of tumor progression control in the carcinogenesis pathway.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
Journal: Brazilian Journal of Oncology
DOI: 10.1055/s-00059887
e-issn: 2526-8732
Publisher: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Publisher address: Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
No citations found for this article.
1. Siegel, R L and Miller, K D and Goding Sauer, A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin [online]. 2020, vol. 70, p. 145-164. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21601 Ver referência
2. Edwards, B K and Ward, E and Kohler, B A. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer [online]. 2010, vol. 116, p. 544-573. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24760 Ver referência
3. Sung, H and Ferlay, J and Siegel, R L. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin [online]. 2021, vol. 71, p. 209-249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 Ver referência
4. Weitz, J and Koch, M and Debus, J and Höhler, T and Galle, P R and Büchler, M W. Colorectal cancer. Lancet [online]. 2005, vol. 365, p. 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17706-X Ver referência
5. Fearon, E R and Vogelstein, B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell [online]. 1990, vol. 61, p. 759-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-I Ver referência
6. Rowan, A J and Lamlum, H and Ilyas, M. APC mutations in sporadic colorectal tumors: A mutational “hotspot” and interdependence of the “two hits”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [online]. 2000, vol. 97, p. 3352-3357. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.7.3352 Ver referência
7. Zhang, L and Shay, J W. Multiple Roles of APC and its Therapeutic Implications in Colorectal Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst [online]. 2017, vol. 109, p. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djw332 Ver referência
8. Vogelstein, B and Fearon, E R and Hamilton, S R. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med [online]. 1988, vol. 319, p. 525-532. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198809013190901 Ver referência
9. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature [online]. 2012, vol. 487, p. 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11252 Ver referência
10. Senft, D and Qi, J and Ronai, Z A. Ubiquitin ligases in oncogenic transformation and cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer [online]. 2018, vol. 18, p. 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.105 Ver referência
11. Kumar, A and Aguirre, J D and Condos, T E. Disruption of the autoinhibited state primes the E3 ligase parkin for activation and catalysis. EMBO J [online]. 2015, vol. 34, p. 2506-2521. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201592337 Ver referência
12. Chakraborty, J and Basso, V and Ziviani, E. Post translational modification of Parkin. Biol Direct [online]. 2017, vol. 12, p. 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-017-0176-3 Ver referência
13. Xu, L and Lin, D C and Yin, D and Koeffler, H P. An emerging role of PARK2 in cancer. J Mol Med (Berl) [online]. 2014, vol. 92, p. 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-013-1107-0 Ver referência
14. Gupta, A and Anjomani-Virmouni, S and Koundouros, N and Poulogiannis, G. [object Object]. Mol Cell Oncol [online]. 2017, vol. 4, p. e1329692. https://doi.org/10.1080/23723556.2017.1329692 Ver referência
15. Denison, S R and Wang, F and Becker, N A. Alterations in the common fragile site gene Parkin in ovarian and other cancers. Oncogene [online]. 2003, vol. 22, p. 8370-8378. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207072 Ver referência
16. Zhang, C and Lin, M and Wu, R. Parkin, a p53 target gene, mediates the role of p53 in glucose metabolism and the Warburg effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [online]. 2011, vol. 108, p. 16259-16264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1113884108 Ver referência
17. Yeo, C WS and Ng, F SL and Chai, C. Parkin pathway activation mitigates glioma cell proliferation and predicts patient survival. Cancer Res [online]. 2012, vol. 72, p. 2543-2553. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3060 Ver referência
18. Veeriah, S and Taylor, B S and Meng, S. Somatic mutations of the Parkinson's disease-associated gene PARK2 in glioblastoma and other human malignancies. Nat Genet [online]. 2010, vol. 42, p. 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.491 Ver referência
19. Agirre, X and Román-Gómez, J and Vázquez, I. Abnormal methylation of the common PARK2 and PACRG promoter is associated with downregulation of gene expression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia. Int J Cancer [online]. 2006, vol. 118, p. 1945-1953. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21584 Ver referência
20. Picchio, M C and Martin, E S and Cesari, R. Alterations of the tumor suppressor gene Parkin in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res [online]. 2004, vol. 10, p. 2720-2724. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0086 Ver referência
21. Duan, H and Lei, Z and Xu, F. PARK2 suppresses proliferation and tumorigenicity in non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol [online]. 2019, vol. 9, p. 790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00790 Ver referência
22. Wang, F and Denison, S and Lai, J P. Parkin gene alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer [online]. 2004, vol. 40, p. 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.20020 Ver referência
23. Fujiwara, M and Marusawa, H and Wang, H Q. Parkin as a tumor suppressor gene for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene [online]. 2008, vol. 27, p. 6002-6011. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.199 Ver referência
24. Poulogiannis, G and McIntyre, R E and Dimitriadi, M. PARK2 deletions occur frequently in sporadic colorectal cancer and accelerate adenoma development in Apc mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [online]. 2010, vol. 107, p. 15145-15150. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009941107 Ver referência
25. Kühl Svoboda Baldin, R and Austrália Paredes Marcondes Ribas, C and de Noronha, L. Expression of Parkin, APC, APE1, and Bcl-xL in Colorectal Polyps. J Histochem Cytochem [online]. 2021, vol. 69, p. 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1369/00221554211026296 Ver referência
26. da Silva-Camargo, C CV and Svoboda Baldin, R K and Costacurta Polli, N L. Parkin protein expression and its impact on survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Med [online]. 2018, vol. 15, p. 61-69. https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2017.0136 Ver referência
27. Bhat, Z I and Kumar, B and Bansal, S. Association of PARK2 promoter polymorphisms and methylation with colorectal cancer in North Indian population. Gene [online]. 2019, vol. 682, p. 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.10.010 Ver referência
28. Baldin, R KS and Júnior, R AA and Azevedo, M. Interobserver variability in histological diagnosis of serrated colorectal polyps. J Coloproctol (Rio J) [online]. 2015, vol. 35, p. 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcol.2015.06.008 Ver referência
29. Anselmi Júnior, R A and Souza, CMde and Azevedo, MLVde and Montemor Netto, M R and Baldin, R KS and Sebastião, A PM and Soares, LFdeP and Tullio, L F and Noronha, Lde. The role of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) and cycloxygenase-2 (COX2) in carcinogenesis of colorectal polyps. J Coloproctol (Rio J) [online]. 2018, vol. 38, p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcol.2017.08.005 Ver referência
30. Umar, A and Boland, C R and Terdiman, J P. Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst [online]. 2004, vol. 96, p. 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh034 Ver referência
31. Bustamante-Lopez, L A and Nahas, S C and Nahas, C SR and Pinto, R A and Marques, C FS and Cecconello, I. Is there a difference between right- versus left-sided colon cancers? Does side make any difference in long-term follow-up? ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo). [online]. 2019, vol. 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020190001e1479 Ver referência
32. Meguid, R A and Slidell, M B and Wolfgang, C L and Chang, D C and Ahuja, N. Is there a difference in survival between right- versus left-sided colon cancers?. Ann Surg Oncol [online]. 2008, vol. 15, p. 2388-2394. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0015-y Ver referência
33. Mao, L and Liu, H and Zhang, R. PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy inhibits warangalone-induced mitochondrial apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Aging (Albany NY) [online]. 2021, vol. 13, p. 12955-12972. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.202965 Ver referência
Dados de acesso insuficientes para visualização no mapa.