Spondylodiscitis is an infection that affects the intervertebral disc, vertebral body, or posterior arch of the vertebra, with increasing incidence due to immunosuppression, type-2 diabetes melitus (DM2), sepsis, drug abuse, and advances in diagnostic techniques.
The most common symptom is pain, observed in up to 97.6% of the cases, and its location can vary depending on the infection's topography.
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal corresponds to 80% of the cases of anal neoplasia, with an annual incidence of 0.5 to 2.0 per 100 thousand individuals.
We herein report a rare case of spondylodiscitis mimicking anal canal SCC bone metastasis after salvage chemoradiation for locoregional recurrence and explore potential mechanisms leading to this clinical disease. The study was submitted, reviewed, and approved by the institutional Ethics Committee under submission number 87564924.0.0000.5306. The patient provided written informed consent.
A man aged 61 years, who was an alcoholic, smoker, homosexual, hypertensive, dyslipidemic, diabetic (DM2), and obese, had been diagnosed four years before with poorly-differentiated, non-keratinizing stage-III anal canal SCC. His initial treatment consisted of a single cycle of chemotherapy with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2 from days 1 to 5, combined with 27 Gy of radiotherapy. Despite the healthcare team's recommendation, the patient discontinued treatment before it was completed.
Subsequent anal bleeding and pain after defecation led the patient to seek medical assistance. A locoregional recurrence was confirmed without evidence of distant metastases. He underwent a second course of chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2 from days 1 to 5, during the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy, with an adjusted dose of 34.2 Gy. Due to logistical and social issues, the patient was hospitalized for the entire treatment.
Fourty days posttreatment, the patient experienced acute-onset back pain at the thoracic spine level. He did not present pain irradiation, local trauma, neurological symptoms, fever, dysuria, vomiting, abdominal pain, or weight loss. Upon the initial assessment, he was found to be in a favorable general state, exhibiting signs of discomfort. His heart rate was of 109 beats per minute, with a blood pressure of 186/98 mmHg. The cardiovascular, respiratory, abdominal, and neurological examinations were all normal.
The laboratory tests indicated a hemoglobin level of 11.7 (reference range: 13.0–17.0) mg/dL, a white blood cell count of 7,830/µL (reference range: 4,000–10,000/µL) with 9% of band cells (reference range: 0–10%), and a C-reactive protein (CRP) level of 21.8 (reference level: < 1) mg/dL. Urinalysis was normal. Serological tests for HIV and hepatitis B and C were negative. The presumptive diagnoses included anal canal SCC recurrence, pneumonia, and pyelonephritis. After the blood cultures were obtained, empiric antibiotic therapy with cefuroxime and azithromycin was initiated.
Contrast-enhanced CT scans of the chest and abdomen revealed an extensive paravertebral lesion at the thoracic spine level with soft tissue density (
Fig. 1 Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the chest, mediastinal window. (A) Coronal section; yellow arrow: paravertebral soft tissue density, extending from D7 to D8, with no signs of bone involvement. (B) Axial cut; yellow arrow: issue with paravertebral soft tissue density.
An MRI scan revealed a paravertebral lesion with enhancement of D6 to D9, involving the D7 and D8 vertebrae (
Fig. 2 Magnetic resonance imaging scan of the dorsal spine, T1-weighted, with contrast enhancement and fat suppression, coronal section. (A) Upon the diagnosis; yellow arrow: paravertebral lesion with D6 to D9 enhancement, with involvement of D7 to D8 vertebrae. (B) Control at approximately 30 days: progression of the paravertebral lesion, with vertebral and disc involvement. (C) Control at approximately 60 days: partial improvement of paravertebral alterations, extensive subchondral irregularities in D7 and D8, with a slight reduction in their height.
Fig. 3 Magnetic resonance imaging scan of the thoracic spine, T1-weighted, with contrast enhancement and fat suppression, axial section. (A) Upon diagnosis; yellow arrow: paravertebral lesion with enhancement, including vertebral involvement. (B) Control at approximately 30 days: progression of the paravertebral lesion and of the vertebral involvement. (C) Control at approximately 60 days: partial improvement of paravertebral changes.
Fig. 4 Bone scintigraphy. (A) Upon diagnosis, increased osteoblastic activity from D7 to D8. (B) Control exam approximately 30 days after the diagnosis. Transverse stretching of osteoblastic hyperactivity between D7 and D8. (C) Control exam approximately 6 months after the diagnosis. No significant changes were observed compared to the previous exam.
Biological material for the pathological analysis was collected through video-assisted thoracoscopy. The anatomopathological examination revealed inflammatory cells without evidence of neoplasia or infectious agents (
Fig. 5 Anatomopathological examination. (A) Several small vessels and a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate at the bottom. (B) Lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, without formation of neoplastic lesions. Plasma cell on arrowhead. (C) Devitalized bone spicules, being eliminated inside a “sinus”. The inflammatory infiltrate also includes some polymorphonuclear neutrophils.
The patient remained hospitalized for 6 weeks postdiagnosis, continuing treatment with broad-spectrum antimicrobial drugs and showing clinical improvement. However, subsequent imaging studies showed progression of the paravertebral lesion with involvement of the vertebrae and the intervertebral disc at D7 to D8 (
One month postdischarge, follow-up imaging studies showed partial resolution of the that the paravertebral lesion. Nevertheless, chronic signs of spondylodiscitis persisted, such as subchrondral irregularities at D7 and D8 and a slight reduction in their heights (
The diagnosis of pain in oncology patients can be challenging, as immunosuppression and multiple approaches during diagnosis and treatment can increase the risk of many pathologies, such as inflammation and infections. Therefore, a thorough clinical evaluation is essential before attributing pain to recurrence or progressive neoplastic disease.
Spondylodiscitis, an infectious condition, often requires prolonged hospitalization and complete rest for the patient. If not promptly recognized and treated, it can progress to chronic pain and irreversible neurological deficits.
The patient in the case herein reported aligns with the epidemiological profile of spondylodiscitis, considering gender, age, DM2, obesity, and neoplasia.
The radiological alterations in the case herein reported were atypical, complicating the initial diagnosis. Chest CT scans revealed a paravertebral lesion with contrast enhancement but without vertebral or intervertebral disc involvement. Thoracic spine MRI showed a paravertebral and vertebral lesion, hypointense on T1-weighted sequences and enhanced after contrast, without intervertebral disc involvement. This ruled out the possibility of discitis and suggested neoplasia or inflammation/infection. The absence of discitis may occur in the early stage of spondylodiscitis, particularly in immunocompromised patients, as in the present case.
The second MRI scan revealed enhancement in vertebral plateaus and discs, raising the possibility of spondylodiscitis. The lesion's progression was likely secondary to manipulation during video-assisted thoracoscopy. The third MRI scan showed the natural evolution of spondylodiscitis.
Spondylodiscitis can develop endogenously via hematogenous spread or exogenously through contiguity from invasive procedures. Hematogenous spread is the most common route, often associated with sepsis and urinary tract, respiratory or gastrointestinal infections.
In the case herein reported, antibiotics were selected considering the patient's risk factors, such as DM2, neoplasia, and recent and prolonged hospitalization. Linezolid is particularly indicated for the treatment of MRSA infections.
The combination of linezolid and clindamycin targeted Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA. Meropenem broadened the antibiotic range to include Gram-negative bacteria. The patient's ongoing antibiotic treatment may have influenced the negative culture results from the biopsy. The treatment should include intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics for 6 to 8 weeks until pathogen identification, followed by oral antibiotics for about 6 weeks until laboratory and radiological improvement.
Oral antibiotics such as clindamycin, fluoroquinolones, metronidazole, rifampicin, and linezolid are recommended to treat osteomyelitis as alternatives to intravenous antibiotics.
Ratiu et al.
The criteria for hospital discharge in spondylodiscitis cases include the absence of back pain, resolution of the inflammatory pattern, normal body temperature, normalized CRP values and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, along with stabilization or improvement of disc and vertebrae abnormalities.
In conclusion, the evaluation and investigation of pain in oncological patients should consider diagnoses beyond metastasis, such as those of infectious diseases, which are more common due to immunosuppression, increased vulnerability, and the multiple interventions to which this group is submitted.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
Journal: Brazilian Journal of Oncology
DOI: 10.1055/s-00059887
e-issn: 2526-8732
Publisher: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Publisher address: Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
No citations found for this article.
1. Herrero, CFPdS and Nascimento, ALd and Cunha, R P and Souza, JPVd and Nogueira-Barbosa, M H and Defino, H LA. Infectious spondylodiscitis: Has there been any evolution in the diagnostic and treatment outcomes?. Coluna/Columna [online]. 2014, vol. 13, p. 294-297.
2. Ratiu, I A and Moisa, C F and Ţiburcă, L and Hagi-Islai, E and Ratiu, A and Bako, G C. Antimicrobial Treatment Challenges in the Management of Infective Spondylodiscitis Associated with Hemodialysis: A Comprehensive Review of Literature and Case Series Analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) [online]. 2024, vol. 13, p. 284.
3. Álvarez-Narváez, A R and Elizalde-Martínez, E and Moheno-Gallardo, A J and Lares-Cárdenas, L A and López-Valencia, J and Torres-González, R and Morales-de Los Santos, R. Caracterización y asociación clínico bacteriológica en la espondilodiscitis piógena. Acta Ortop Mex [online]. 2019, vol. 33, p. 141-145.
4. Carvalho, VNd and Silva, F F and Sarmento, P M and Baptista, S and Sá, J. Espondilodiscite Infeciosa: Formas de Apresentação, Diagnóstico e Tratamento. Med Interna [online]. 2018, vol. 25, p. 85-90.
5. Faria, R and Borges, C and Carrondo, H and Banza, M J. [Spondylodiscitis: which etiology?]. Acta Med Port [online]. 2011, vol. 24, p. 1059-1064.
6. Sánchez, P M. Spondylodiscitis. Radiologia [online]. 2016, vol. 58, p. 50-59.
7. Cordero-Delgado, D A and Moheno-Gallardo, A J and Torres-González, R and Mata-Hernández, A and Elizalde-Martínez, E and Pérez-Atanasio, J M. [Evidence and recommendation of empirical antimicrobial treatment in pyogenic spondylodiscitis: systematic review]. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc [online]. 2017, vol. 55, p. S6-S13.
8. Finger, G and Cecchini, AMdL and Sfreddo, E and Cecchini, F MdL and Lunardi, L W and Nascimento, T Ld and Falavigna, A. Spondylodiscitis Investigation and Therapeutic Protocol: Neurosurgery Service Results. Coluna/Columna [online]. 2019, vol. 18, p. 138-143.
9. Capelo, J and Carragoso, A and Albuquerque, C and Mocho, M L and Canto-Moreira, N. Espondilodiscite Infecciosa: o estudo de quarenta e um casos. Acta Reumatol Port [online]. 2007, vol. 32, p. 255-262.
10. Soto, A and Fica, A and Dabanch, J and Olivares, F and Porte, L. Espondilodisicitis Chile. Rev Chilena Infectol [online]. 2016, vol. 33, p. 322-330.
11. Queiroz, J WM and Pereira, P CAdA and Figueiredo, E G. Espondilodiscite: revisão de literatura. Arq Bras Neurocir [online]. 2013, vol. 32, p. 230-236.
12. Sobottke, R and Seifert, H and Fätkenheuer, G and Schmidt, M and Gossmann, A and Eysel, P. Current diagnosis and treatment of spondylodiscitis. Dtsch Arztebl Int [online]. 2008, vol. 105, p. 181-187.
13. Rogers, J E and Sirisaengtaksin, A and Leung, M and Morris, V K and Xiao, L and Huey, R. Hepatic Metastasectomy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal: A Case Series of a Curative Approach. Cancers (Basel) [online]. 2023, vol. 15, p. 3890.
14. Dewdney, A and Rao, S. Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: time for a shift in the treatment paradigm?. ISRN Oncol [online]. 2012, vol. 2012, p. 756591. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/756591 Ver referência
15. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Anal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up*. Ann Oncol [online]. 2021, vol. 32, p. 1087-1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.015 Ver referência
16. Gondal, T A and Chaudhary, N and Bajwa, H and Rauf, A and Le, D and Ahmed, S. Anal Cancer: The Past, Present and Future. Curr Oncol [online]. 2023, vol. 30, p. 3232-3250.
17. Ajani, J and Winter, K and Gunderson, L and Pedersen, J. Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs. fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: Commentary. JAMA [online]. 2008, vol. 299, p. 1914-1921.
18. Mitsuura, C and Miyamoto, Y and Ogawa, K and Sawayama, H and Toihata, T and Harada, K. Successful Management of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Liver and Ovary Metastases: A Case Report. In Vivo [online]. 2022, vol. 36, p. 3023-3028.
19. Cariati, P and Ozan, D P and Rodriguez, S A. Vertebral metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Front Oral Maxillofac Med [online]. 2020, vol. 2, p. 1-3.
20. Crombé, A and Fadli, D and Clinca, R and Reverchon, G and Cevolani, L and Girolami, M. Imaging of Spondylodiscitis: A Comprehensive Updated Review-Multimodality Imaging Findings, Differential Diagnosis, and Specific Microorganisms Detection. Microorganisms [online]. 2024, vol. 12, p. 893.
21. Haddad, N and Ajaz, J and Mansour, L and Kasemodel, R and Jarvis, J and Jarad, J. A Review of the Clinical Utilization of Oral Antibacterial Therapy in the Treatment of Bone Infections in Adults. Antibiotics (Basel) [online]. 2023, vol. 13, p. 4.
22. Hecquet, S and Verhoeven, F and Aubry, S and Prati, C and Wendlin, D and Chirouze, C. Interest of follow-up radiological imaging in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Journal of Clinical Medicine [online]. 2021, vol. 10, p. 2690.
Dados de acesso insuficientes para visualização no mapa.