Association between Spirituality, Religiosity, and Breast Cancer Treatment

Introduction

Quality of life encompasses several categories within the individual and social spheres. It is based on the understanding of fundamental human needs, both material and spiritual, and has its most relevant focus on the concept of health promotion.1 2 The World Health Organization (WHO) defines quality of life as an individual's perception of their position in life in the context of culture, value systems, goals, expectations, standards, and concerns.1 3

Breast cancer impair many women's quality of life. In 2020, it became the most common neoplasm in women, accounting for more than 2.26 million cases and more than 685 thousand deaths worldwide.4 The treatments related to breast cancer are evolving every year and providing more conservative surgeries and an increasing survival rate. In the United States, there are more than 12 million cancer survivors and, by the year 2024, this total might reach 19 million.5 In Brazil, breast cancer is the malignant disease that has most affected women since 1979. More than 73,600 new cases are estimated for the 2023 to 2025 triennium, with this tumor having the highest incidence in the Brazilian female population in all regions of the country.6 Additionally, national data show that breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths women, reaching up to 12.79 deaths per 100 thousand women in the Southern region of Brazil.7

Female cancer survivors face physical, psychological, and social hardship. After diagnosis, women worldwide share concerns about the treatment and healing process, body image, interpersonal relationships, and fear of the unknown.8 Complaints such as fatigue, irritability, memory loss, decreased energy level, and recurrent pain are common, and negatively impact quality of life.9 This worsening is associated not only with the disease symptoms themselves, but also with social aspects, support network, treatment type, side effects, body image, and multiple hospital visits.9 Additionally, chemotherapy patients with comorbidities, less social support, and more unmet needs present the worst quality of life scenarios.10 Studies that assessed this topic in patients with breast cancer, using several questionnaires integrating social and personal issues, showed the importance of a better understanding of the risk factors that lead to reduced quality of life, allowing for interventions directed to its improvement.9 10 11

In this sense, spirituality has shown to be a protective factor against mental disorders and for better quality of life, being a common emotional support for cancer patients.12 There is no strict definition of spirituality. It can be divided methodologically into secular and religious. Secular spirituality is a state of mind, a means of self-expression, and a type of interest focused on undefined forms of transcendence.13 Religious spirituality, on the other hand, encompasses people devoted to a higher being, with participation in ceremonies, adoption of specific practices, and belief in a God.13

Religiosity and spirituality are different but complementary. Brazil is the second most religious country in the world, with approximately 94% of the population declaring themselves religious.12 Therefore, understanding this topic is of great importance and can be useful to develop means to provide psychological support and improve the quality of life of women undergoing cancer treatment.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study, conducted at a Cancer Center, from February 2021 to August 2022. This study was approved by the ethics and research committee under number 3077/20. All patients with breast cancer treated at the institution who signed the informed consent form were included in the project. After signing the informed consent form, these women received the research link generated on the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap, Vanderbilt University) system for completion of two questionnaires: the Spiritual/Religious Coping (SRCOPE)14 scale and the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Instrument – Spirituality, Religion and Personal Beliefs Module (WHOQOL–SRPB).

The SRCOPE scale is a questionnaire covering 92 questions that describes how people use their faith to cope with stress, relating it to quality of life and physical and mental health, as shown in Supplementary Fig. S1 (online only).14

The WHOQOL - SRPB questionnaire is part of the WHO instrument for assessing quality of life and includes Spirituality, Religion, and Personal Beliefs addressed in 31 questions, as shown in Supplementary Fig. S2 (online only).15 Both questionnaires use a Likert scale: 1 - not at all, 2 - a little, 3 - more or less, 4 - a lot, and 5 - very much.

Patients' age, education, religion, chosen treatment, and tumor's characteristics, such as histological type, were also collected. All the surgeries in which the breast was removed (with or without sparing the nipple), were classified as radical, regardless of the procedure performed in the axilla. All data obtained were entered into the institutional REDCap system. Quantitative variables were expressed in summary measures of position and dispersion, such as mean and standard deviation (SD), or minimum and maximum values. Qualitative variables were expressed in absolute and relative frequencies (%).

For the hypothesis, the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed. Spearman's Ro test was performed to assess the correlation between age and the scores of the questionnaires. Statistically significant values were considered for p-values < 0.05.

Results

There were 49 female patients included in the study. Their mean age was 54 years (32–74, 54 ± 10). Of that total, 32 patients (65.3%) were married, 1 (2%) lived in civil partnership, and 5 (10.2%) were separated or divorced. About schooling, 45 participants answered: 73.6% had completed university, 6.1% had not completed university, 6.1% had completed high school, 2% had not completed high school, and 4% had completed elementary school. Regarding religion, 51% identified as catholic, 24.5% were spiritist, 8.2% evangelical, and 16.3% followed other religions (Table 1).

Epidemiological characteristics of the patients included in the study

Characteristics

n

%

Marital status

 Single

 Married

 Civil partnership

 Divorced

49

11

32

1

5

100%

22.4%

65.3%

2%

10.2%

Schooling

 Incomplete elementary school

 Complete elementary school

 Incomplete high school

 Complete high school

 Incomplete university

 Complete university

 Did not respond

0

2

1

3

3

36

4

0%

4%

2%

6.1%

6.1%

73.6%

8.2%

Religion

 Catholic

 Evangelical

 Spiritist

 Others

25

4

12

8

51%

8.2%

24.5%

16.3%

Histological tumor type

 Ductal carcinoma in situ

 Ductal invasive carcinoma / NST

 Lobular invasive carcinoma

 Others

2

37

2

8

4.1%

75.5%

4.1%

16.3%

Treatment received*

 CT neoadjuvant

 CT adjuvant

 Conservative surgery

 Radical surgery

 Sentinel node biopsy

 Axillary lymphadenectomy

 Intraoperative RT (intrabeam)

 External RT

 Hormone therapy

 Immediate reconstructive surgery

 Delayed reconstructive surgery

12

20

26

25

31

15

5

28

39

7

9

24.5%

40.8%

53.1%

51%

63.3%

30.6%

10.2%

57.1%

79.5%

14.3%

18.4%

Abbreviations: CT, chemotherapy; NST, nonspecial subtype; RT, radiotherapy.

Note: * Patients underwent more than one treatment; therefore, percentages were calculated based on the total (n = 49).

Invasive ductal carcinoma or nonspecial type was the most prevalent among the patients, corresponding to 75.5% (n = 37) of the cases. Among the treatments given, there was no significant difference between the number of patients who underwent conservative (n = 26) or radical breast (n = 25) surgery, nor regarding immediate (n = 7) or delayed (n = 9) reconstruction. However, more patients underwent sentinel lymph node testing (n = 31), adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 20), external radiation therapy (n = 28), and hormone therapy (n = 39). Many patients underwent a combination of these treatments, so the relative frequency calculated in Table 1 refers to the total number of the sample (49 patients). These data are shown in Table 1.

The SRCOPE was answered by 48 patients, with a higher adherence for completion than the WHOQOL-SRPB questionnaire (n = 37). Both assessment instruments contained questions that sought to understand the importance of factors such as optimism, hope, faith, well-being, motivation, forgiveness, and connection to God or to a higher spiritual Being during the patients' treatment. According to the SRCOPE scale's answers, only 2% of the patients felt anger against God and His designs, 48% sought protection and guidance from spiritual entities (saints, spirits, amulets, among others). God's love and protection was sought by 50 and 39.6% of the patients, respectively. There was a search for support in a religious or prayer house by 66.7% of the patients. These data are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1 Description of patients' responses to questions 12, 8, 4, 2, 74, 76, 38, 36, 70, 72, 58, and 20 of the SRCOPE scale, expressed in percentages.

Regarding their feelings about God, 2.1% of the patients felt abandoned by God, 4.2% tried to deal with the situation without God's help, while 60.4% of the patients thought that the disease could bring them closer to God, and 62.5% tried to build a stronger relationship with a superior Being (Fig. 1). About how patients sought help, more than half of the patients sought, even in a minimal way, help or comfort in religious literature (64.6%), help through meditation (60.4%) and the laying on of hands through passes, blessings, prayers, magnetism, or reiki (68.7%). The desire for spiritual rebirth was also present in 29.2% of the women (Fig. 1).

Other results from the SRCOPE scale not shown in Fig. 1 include: questioning whether God did exist (question 54), which was refuted by 95.8% of the participants, with only 8.1% answering that they wondering what they could have done for God to punish them (question 83). Also, seeking forgiveness for mistakes made was considered very important for almost 60% of them (question 60).

Only 37 patients answered the WHOQOL–SRPB questionnaire. For 91.9% of the respondents, there was a contribution of faith to their well-being, and connection with a spiritual being helps them tolerate stress, by feeling that their life has a purpose (Fig. 2). Furthermore, optimism proved to be important in the quality of life for most patients (67.6%), and being optimistic has a positive impact on quality of life. Most of the patients (91.9%) revealed a feeling of gratitude for being able to appreciate the things in nature (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 Description of patients' responses to questions 29, 7, 2, 28, 27, and 12 of the WHOQOL – SRPB questionnaire, expressed in percentages.

When the hypothesis tests were applied, no correlation was observed between the scores obtained in the SRCOPE and WHOQOL-SRBP and marital status, schooling, religion, and treatment type, except for intraoperative radiotherapy, which showed a positive correlation with the SRCOPE score (p = 0.018), as shown in Table 2.

Correlation between the patients' characteristics and the scores of the SRCOPE scale and the WHOQOL – SRPB

Marital status

Schooling

Religion

Tumor histology

CT adjuvant

CT neoadjuvant

Conservative surgery

Radical surgery

SNB

ALD

Intraop RT

External RT

HT

Immediate reconstructive surgery

Delayed reconstructive surgery

SRCOPE scale

0.368

0.647

0.164

0.832

0.616

0.291

0.569

0.942

0.706

0.230

0.018*

0.959

0.662

0.131

0.284

Search for meaning (F1)

0.823

0.647

0.015*

0.460

0.356

0.902

0.127

0.326

0.482

0.403

0.275

0.715

0.717

0.005*

0.272

Strategies of control (F2)

0.533

0.775

0.510

0.222

0.249

0.703

0.860

0.942

0.177

0.518

0.290

0.411

0.242

0.091

1

Seek support in God (F3)

0.956

0.586

0.401

0.401

0.714

0.326

0.664

0.984

0.923

0.815

0.092

0.747

0.523

0.203

0.567

Seek spiritual support (F4)

0.902

0.204

0.441

0.774

0.564

0.476

0.534

0.967

0.804

0.316

0.016*

0.942

0.540

0.031*

0.835

Transformation of yourself and/or your life (F5)

0.322

0.689

0.404

0.871

0.217

0.098

0.431

0.757

0.754

0.322

0.085

0.596

0.755

0.287

0.272

Religions' actions toward spirituality (F6)

0.511

0.422

0.006*

0.401

0.368

0.694

0.357

0.695

0.167

0.024*

0.207

0.795

1

0.492

0.250

Seek spiritual growth/knowledge (F7)

0.456

0.174

0.364

0.72

0.698

0.088

0.885

0.613

0.914

0.578

0.025*

0.835

0.475

0.668

0.190

WHOQOL-SRPB

0.715

0.967

0.365

0.731

0.135

0.350

0.395

0.841

0.906

0.848

0.140

0.819

0.259

0.880

0.319

Connection to a high being or spiritual force (T1)

0.392

0.379

0.124

0.373

0.276

0.662

0.312

0.722

0.699

0.176

0.106

0.915

1

0.747

0.407

Meaning of life (T2)

0.876

0.803

0.923

0.651

0.843

0.805

0.643

0.914

0.389

0.270

0.153

0.400

0.259

0.620

0.202

Admiration (T3)

0.638

0.967

0.968

0.651

0.819

0.227

0.761

0.654

0.960

0.614

0.248

0.725

0.894

0.503

0.245

Wholeness and integration (T4)

0.876

0.222

0.100

0.651

0.350

0.531

0.737

0.722

0.578

0.392

0.071

0.531

0.747

0.813

0.542

Spiritual strength (T5)

0.689

0.379

0.340

0.599

0.237

0.458

0.620

0.889

0.302

0.226

0.036*

0.772

0.582

0.747

0.855

Inner peace (T6)

0.200

0.647

0.656

0.317

0.61

0.213

0.227

0.654

0.933

0.664

0.914

0.551

0.065

0.560

0.202

Hope and optimism (T7)

0.116

0.478

0.951

0.574

0.02*

0.506

0.267

0.411

0.853

0.741

0.914

0.472

0.160

0.714

0.061

Faith (T8)

0.433

0.257

0.631

0.110

0.098

0.293

0.378

0.298

0.775

0.986

0.846

0.112

0.719

0.880

0.347

Abbreviations: ALD, axillary lymphadenectomy; CT, chemotherapy; HT, hormone therapy (Mann-Whitney test); RT, radiotherapy. Intraop, intraoperative; SNB, sentinel node biopsy; SRCOPE scale, Spiritual/Religious Coping scale; WHOQOL – SRPB, World Health Organization's quality of life instrument - spirituality, religion and personal beliefs module.

Note: * Significance level p-value ≤ 0.05.

When the questionnaires' domains were assessed separately, a positive correlation between intraoperative radiotherapy and the domains of seeking spiritual support (p = 0.016), personal spiritual growth/knowledge (p = 0.025), and spiritual strength (p = 0.036) could be observed. Also, that there was a positive correlation between axillary lymphadenectomy and religious actions toward spirituality (p = 0.024) was found, as well as between adjuvant chemotherapy and hope and optimism (p = 0.02). A positive relationship between immediate reconstructive surgery and seeking meaning (p = 0.005) and seeking support (p = 0.032) was also observed. Although there is no statistical difference, there is a tendency to positively relate hormone therapy with inner peace (p = 0.065), and late reconstructive surgery with hope and optimism (p = 0.061), as shown in Table 2.

When we assessed the type of religion of the patients, although there was no correlation with the scores of the questionnaires, a positive relationship was observed with search for meaning (p = 0.015) and religious actions toward spirituality (p = 0.006), as shown in Table 2, with the spiritist religion standing out in both domains (Fig. 3). Regarding the patients' age at tumor diagnosis, there was a weak correlation with the scores of SRCOPE and WHOQOL-SRBP (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3 Relationship between religion and domains F1 (search for meaning) and F6 (religious actions toward spirituality) of the SRCOPE scale. Kruskal-Wallis test. Spiritist F1 (p = 0.007) and F6 (p = 0.001) charts.

Fig. 4 Correlation between age at cancer diagnosis and SRCOPE and WHOQOL-SRPB scores. Spearman correlation (SRCOPE: 0.276; WHOQOL-SRPB: 0.117).

Discussion

Studies have shown an association between spirituality and quality of life.16 17 However, the measurement of spirituality and religiosity is a challenge and the cause of heterogeneous results among studies.

According to Ferreira et al. spirituality is related to the feeling of transcendence, while religiosity involves a natural tendency toward religious feelings and sacred things. Both are coping tools that help patients deal with cancer, positively influencing their quality of life. Furthermore, both religiosity and spirituality can appear after disease diagnosis, when patients feel a lack of meaning to life, or they can be present since before the diagnosis and be a source of strength and hope during treatment.12

Data from this study showed that most of the patients sought love and protection from God and/or from spiritual entities at some time during their treatment. Additionally, more than 60% of the patients in this study tried to reach a strong relationship with God or another higher entity, 89% of them believe that faith contributes to well-being, and 78.4% believe that connecting with a spiritual being helps them tolerate stress. These data are close to the results showed by other studies, which relate a positive image of God with hope and optimism,18 lower stress, and psychological well-being.19 20

In addition, most of the patients in this study used spirituality and religiosity as tools to help them coping throughout their treatment and follow-up. It was observed that most of them felt optimistic, which promoted improvement in their quality of life. This fact was corroborated by Purnell et al., who demonstrated a positive correlation between the feeling of peace and meaning with quality of life.21

Although less significant, in this study, 2.1% of the patients felt abandoned and rebelled against God. The feeling that they were being punished for their mistakes and need to ask God for forgiveness also reveals that the diagnosis and the confrontation with this disease lead to negative feelings and bring into play questions that are often linked to historical, cultural, and personal beliefs. According to Paredes and Pereira, a traumatic event, such as the diagnosis of breast cancer, can arouse both posttraumatic stress and growth, the latter being related to greater spirituality.22

The present study was unprecedented in assessing the correlation between various aspects of breast cancer treatment, with responses to the SRCOPE and WHOQOL-SRPB scales. Search for meaning and spiritual support was found to be correlated with immediate reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, the presence of religious actions with axillary lymphadenectomy, as well as hope and optimism with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Hypothetically, these connections may be related to expectation toward less mutilating treatment, with immediate reconstructive surgery, and toward cure, with adjuvant chemotherapy and axillary lymphadenectomy. Gall and Bilodeau assessed women before, during, and up to 1 year of surveillance after breast cancer treatment, and demonstrated that attachment to God remained stable and secure in the context of a stressor.23 On the other hand, the positive correlation found in seeking spiritual support, growth/knowledge, and strength with intraoperative radiotherapy may have occurred due to the low number of patients undergoing this procedure (n = 5).

It is traditionally expected for older and married women to have higher degrees of religiosity/spirituality. However, like the results obtained by Majda et al., this study found no difference between the degree of spirituality/religiosity and marital status or educational level.13

The present study also correlated search for meaning and religious actions with spiritism. Although not including spiritists, a study by Johnstone et al.24 showed differences between spirituality and religiosity between Buddhism, Catholicism, Judaism, Islamism, and Protestantism. In their study, Muslims showed more reports of meaning toward God and stronger values and beliefs in religion. Protestants and Catholics reported more connection with forgiveness, and Buddhists showed more openness to new experiences.24

Spirituality and religiosity were also associated with fewer side effects to treatment, such as fatigue, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, poor appetite, and diarrhea.13 A Brazilian study that assessed the association between spirituality and religiosity in patients during radiotherapy demonstrated faith and “meaning of life” had positive correlations with less fatigue and insomnia.25 Additionally, studies have shown that spirituality is associated with patients' greater understanding and participation in the treatment, especially in the decision to start chemotherapy26 and persistence of hormone therapy use despite its side effects.27

Accordingly, the inclusion of religious/spiritual practices as a strategy to improve quality of life during cancer treatment should be discussed. This is a demand also perceived by oncology patients, who consider the recognition of spiritual needs an important part of treatment.16 28 Providing spiritual support is as relevant as identifying patients' spiritual needs. This can be provided through mindfulness-based cognitive therapy,29 meditation,30 yoga,31 and encouraging religious and spiritual practices.32

Online forms brought new perspectives that facilitated contact between researchers and patients even during the pandemic. Due to restrictions on the mobilization of patients and researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a reduction in recruitment, especially in older patients and those who did no know how to participate in the study remotely through an electronic device. Another barrier to the study were issues with personal information, such as outdated or missing e-mail and/or contact phone numbers, registered data that belonged to relatives and not to the patient, and misgivings when receiving a link to access the questionnaires. These limitations can be reviewed for the development of future studies to obtain a larger sample size.

Conclusion

It was found that spirituality and religiosity were important tools for patients to face cancer diagnosis and treatment. Seeking a religious or prayer house, as well as protection, love, and closeness to God or spiritual entities, the laying on of hands, prayers, meditation, and comfort through religious literature were present in their lives. It was also possible to demonstrate the need to identify the religious and spiritual needs of patients to create more comprehensive strategies and improve quality of life during and after cancer treatment.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Authors

About the Journal

Journal: Brazilian Journal of Oncology

DOI: 10.1055/s-00059887

e-issn: 2526-8732

Publisher: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.

Publisher address: Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

No citations found for this article.

References

1. Makluf, A SD and Dias, R C and Barra, AdA. Quality of life assessment in women with breast cancer [Avaliação da qualidade de vida em mulheres com câncer da mama]. Rev Bras Cancerol [online]. 2006, vol. 52, p. 49-58. https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2006v52n1.1909 Ver referência

2. Minayo, MCdS and Hartz, ZMdA and Buss, P M. Qualidade de vida e saúde: um debate necessário. Cien Saude Colet [online]. 2000, vol. 5, p. 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232000000100002 Ver referência

3. Sales, C and Paiva, L and Scandiuzzi, D and Anjos, A. Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors: Social Functioning [Qualidade de vida de mulheres tratadas de câncer de mama: funcionamento social]. Rev Bras Cancerol [online]. 2001, vol. 47, p. 263-272. https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2001v47n3.2304 Ver referência

4. [online]. Available from: <https://www.iarc.who.int/cancer-type/breast-cancer/>.

5. Miller, K D and Siegel, R L and Lin, C C and Mariotto, A B and Kramer, J L and Rowland, J H. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin [online]. 2016, vol. 66, p. 271-289. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21349 Ver referência

6. . Cited: Dec 6, 2023 [online]. Available from: <https://www.gov.br/inca/pt-br/assuntos/cancer/numeros/estimativa/sintese-de-resultados-e-comentarios>.

7. . Cited: Dec 6, 2023 [online]. Available from: <https://www.gov.br/inca/pt-br/assuntos/gestor-e-profissional-de-saude/controle-do-cancer-de-mama/dados-e-numeros/mortalidade>.

8. Schreiber, J A and Brockopp, D Y. Twenty-five years later–what do we know about religion/spirituality and psychological well-being among breast cancer survivors? A systematic review. J Cancer Surviv [online]. 2012, vol. 6, p. 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-011-0193-7 Ver referência

9. Nguyen, J and Popovic, M and Chow, E and Cella, D and Beaumont, J L and Chu, D. EORTC QLQ-BR23 and FACT-B for the assessment of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a literature review. J Comp Eff Res [online]. 2015, vol. 4, p. 157-166. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.14.76 Ver referência

10. Ho, P J and Gernaat, S AM and Hartman, M and Verkooijen, H M. Health-related quality of life in Asian patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Open [online]. 2018, vol. 8, p. e020512. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020512 Ver referência

11. Brady, M J and Cella, D F and Mo, F and Bonomi, A E and Tulsky, D S and Lloyd, S R. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol [online]. 1997, vol. 15, p. 974-986. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.974 Ver referência

12. Ferreira, L F and Freire, AdP and Silveira, A LC. A Influência da Espiritualidade e da Religiosidade na Aceitação da Doença e no Tratamento de Pacientes Oncológicos: Revisão Integrativa da Literatura. Rev Bras Cancerol [online]. 2020, vol. 66, p. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2020v66n2.422 Ver referência

13. Majda, A and Szul, N and Kołodziej, K and Wojcieszek, A and Pucko, Z and Bakun, K. Influence of Spirituality and Religiosity of Cancer Patients on Their Quality of Life. Int J Environ Res Public Health [online]. 2022, vol. 19, p. 4952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19094952 Ver referência

14. Panzini, R G and Bandeira, D R. Spiritual/religious coping scale (SRCOPE Scale): elaboration and construct validation [Escala de coping religioso-espiritual (Escala CRE): elaboração e validação de construto]. Psicol Estud [online]. 2005, vol. 10, p. 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722005000300019 Ver referência

15. Panzini, R G and Maganha, C and da Rocha, N S and Bandeira, D R and Fleck, M P. Validação brasileira do Instrumento de Qualidade de Vida/espiritualidade, religião e crenças pessoais. Rev Saude Publica [online]. 2011, vol. 45, p. 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102011000100018 Ver referência

16. Vallurupalli, M and Lauderdale, K and Balboni, M J and Phelps, A C and Block, S D and Ng, A K. The role of spirituality and religious coping in the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative radiation therapy. J Support Oncol [online]. 2012, vol. 10, p. 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.09.003 Ver referência

17. Tate, D G and Forchheimer, M. Quality of life, life satisfaction, and spirituality: comparing outcomes between rehabilitation and cancer patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil [online]. 2002, vol. 81, p. 400-410. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200206000-00002 Ver referência

18. Gall, T L and Guirguis-Younger, M and Charbonneau, C and Florack, P. The trajectory of religious coping across time in response to the diagnosis of breast cancer. Psychooncology [online]. 2009, vol. 18, p. 1165-1178. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1495 Ver referência

19. Gall, T L and de Renart, R MM and Boonstra, B. Religious Resources in Long-Term Adjustment to Breast Cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol [online]. 2000, vol. 18, p. 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J077v18n02_02 Ver referência

20. Schreiber, J A. Image of God: effect on coping and psychospiritual outcomes in early breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum [online]. 2011, vol. 38, p. 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1188/11.ONF.293-301 Ver referência

21. Purnell, J Q and Andersen, B L and Wilmot, J P. Religious Practice and Spirituality in the Psychological Adjustment of Survivors of Breast Cancer. Couns Values [online]. 2009, vol. 53, p. 165. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007X.2009.tb00123.x Ver referência

22. Paredes, A C and Pereira, M G. Spirituality, Distress and Posttraumatic Growth in Breast Cancer Patients. J Relig Health [online]. 2018, vol. 57, p. 1606-1617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0452-7 Ver referência

23. Gall, T L and Bilodeau, C. Attachment to God and coping with the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer: a longitudinal study. Support Care Cancer [online]. 2020, vol. 28, p. 2779-2788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05149-6 Ver referência

24. Johnstone, B and Yoon, D P and Cohen, D and Schopp, L H and McCormack, G and Campbell, J and Smith, M. Relationships among spirituality, religious practices, personality factors, and health for five different faith traditions. J Relig Health [online]. 2012, vol. 51, p. 1017-1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-012-9615-8 Ver referência

25. Brandão, M L and Fritsch, T Z and Toebe, T RP and Rabin, E G. Association between spirituality and quality of life of women with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Rev Esc Enferm USP [online]. 2021, vol. 55, p. e20200476. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2020-0476 Ver referência

26. Sheppard, V B and Walker, R and Phillips, W and Hudson, V and Xu, H and Cabling, M L. Spirituality in African-American Breast Cancer Patients: Implications for Clinical and Psychosocial Care. J Relig Health [online]. 2018, vol. 57, p. 1918-1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0611-5 Ver referência

27. Toledo, G and Ochoa, C Y and Farias, A J. Religion and spirituality: their role in the psychosocial adjustment to breast cancer and subsequent symptom management of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Support Care Cancer [online]. 2021, vol. 29, p. 3017-3024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05722-4 Ver referência

28. Kang, K A and Kim, S J. Spiritual Care Expectations Among Cancer and Noncancer Patients with Life-Threatening Illnesses. Cancer Nurs [online]. 2023, vol. 47, p. E269-E278. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001213 Ver referência

29. Park, S and Sato, Y and Takita, Y and Tamura, N and Ninomiya, A and Kosugi, T. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Psychological Distress, Fear of Cancer Recurrence, Fatigue, Spiritual Well-Being, and Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer-A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage [online]. 2020, vol. 60, p. 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.02.017 Ver referência

30. Greenlee, H and DuPont-Reyes, M J and Balneaves, L G and Carlson, L E and Cohen, M R and Deng, G. Clinical practice guidelines on the evidence-based use of integrative therapies during and after breast cancer treatment. CA Cancer J Clin [online]. 2017, vol. 67, p. 194-232. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21397 Ver referência

31. Cramer, H and Lauche, R and Klose, P and Lange, S and Langhorst, J and Dobos, G J. Yoga for improving health-related quality of life, mental health and cancer-related symptoms in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [online]. 2017, vol. 2017, p. CD010802. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010802.pub2 Ver referência

32. Breitbart, W. Spirituality and meaning in supportive care: spirituality- and meaning-centered group psychotherapy interventions in advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer [online]. 2002, vol. 10, p. 272-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005200100289 Ver referência

Article images

Fig 1Imagem do artigo
Fig 2Imagem do artigo
Fig 3Imagem do artigo
Fig 4Imagem do artigo

See where this article was accessed

Dados de acesso insuficientes para visualização no mapa.