Comparative Analysis of the Immunohistochemical Expression of the Parkin and APC proteins in Polyps and Colorectal Adenocarcinomas

Introduction

A marked decline in the colorectal cancer (CRC) burden was observed in the twentieth century,1 probably due to the enhancement in colonoscopy screening programs and the improvement in treatment strategies.2 Despite this, CRC remained the third leading cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2020.3

Many hereditary cancer syndromes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of CRC; however, most cases are sporadic.4 It is believed that most CRC cases arise from precursor lesions, such as adenomas, and follow a predictive disease-progression model called the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. This model of carcinogenesis describes progressive phenotypic changes that reflect the acquisition of nonrandom somatic mutations.5 Specifically, mutations in the APC gene are found in most CRC cases,6 and the loss of its tumor-suppressive activity is considered a fundamental and early step in CRC carcinogenesis.7 Since the first description of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence in 1988,8 more than 20 genes involved in this pathway have been identified.9

Ubiquitin ligases (E3) are proteins involved in cellular responses to environmental stress and DNA damage, including the regulation of apoptotic pathways.10 Impairment of E3 favors key processes of cellular carcinogenesis, including genetic instability and deregulated cellular proliferation.10 One of the human E3 is parkin, a protein encoded by the PARK2 (Parkinson disease [autosomal recessive, juvenile] 2) or PRKN (parkin RBR E3 ubiquitin protein ligase) gene. Parkin is present in an autoinhibited form,11 and it has been postulated12 that its activation occurs via posttranslational reversible changes in response to cell stress. A growing body of evidence suggests that PARK2 is involved in diverse carcinogenic pathways, such as mitochondrial quality control, apoptosis, metabolism, and cell-cycle progression,13 and that impaired PARK2 expression promotes cancer progression.14 PARK2 is located in a chromosomal region prone to instability and breakages, called FRA6E, which has already been associated with cancer development.15 A preclinical study16 showed that parkin deficiency increases the susceptibility to cancer development in mice after exposure to an oncogenic insult. Deficiency in parkin expression has been found in various human cancers, including gliomas,17 18 leukemia,19 ovarian cancer,15 lung cancer,20 21 and hepatocarcinoma,22 23 and previous evidence13 has led to the belief that PARK2 acts as a tumor suppressor gene.

Recent studies24 25 26 27 have proposed a role for parkin in CRC development. Decreased parkin expression has been reported in colorectal precursor lesions in mice24 and humans,25 as well as in human CRC.24 26 27 Parkin expression has been found to correlate with APC expression24 26 and with a better prognosis in CRC.26 However, the exact role of parkin in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence remains unknown. No previous studies have compared parkin expression in CRC to that in its precursor lesions to determine whether parkin expression changes during CRC carcinogenesis.

Purpose

The present study aimed to compare the immunohistochemical expression of parkin and APC in colorectal polyps and adenocarcinomas.

Materials and Methods Study Design and Location

We performed an observational cross-sectional study using data collected from Hospital Santa Cruz and Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná (HC-UFPR), both located in the city of Curitiba, state of Paraná, Brazil. The study was approved by the Ethics in Research Committee of HC-UFPR (registered under no. 820.432, dated August 25, 2014), and informed consent was waived for all individuals included in the analysis.

Study Population and Data Collection

We obtained clinicopathological data from patients older than 18 years of age who underwent endoscopic polypectomy for neoplastic polyps at Hospital Santa Cruz in 2008 used in previous studies,25 28 29 as well as from colorectal cancer surgery at HC-UFPR from 2007 to 2011. All available samples were included if the same patient had undergone polypectomy for more than one polyp. The exclusion criteria were: familial history adenomatous polyposis; previous treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy; polyps later diagnosed as inflammatory, hamartomatous, and pseudopolyps; and unavailability of pathological material for analysis.

The clinical data were obtained from medical records stored in the hospital database. All pathological samples were obtained from the Pathology Department of HC-UFPR.

Variables

We collected clinical data on age, sex, number of polyps, and diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Age was stratified into 3 groups according to the Bethesda classification:30 ≤ 45 years, 46 to 55 years, and ≥ 56 years. This classification considers that hereditary CRC commonly affects individuals younger than 45 years of age, whereas patients older than 56 years have a higher chance of developing sporadic CRC.

The pathological data included polyp/adenocarcinoma laterality, morphology, size, histology, grade, and immunohistochemical markers. Histological slides were analyzed by a pathologist with experience in gastrointestinal pathology for a diagnostic review.

We analyzed laterality as a dichotomous variable. Therefore, the right-colon neoplasms included appendiceal, cecal, ascending, hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon neoplasms; and left-colon neoplasms included the distal transverse colon, splenic flexure, descending, sigmoid, rectosigmoid junction, and rectum (upper, middle and lower) neoplasms. We opted for this distribution following the current knowledge that right-sided colon lesions present distinct biological, epidemiological, and pathological characteristics, and usually a worse prognosis compared to left-sided colon cancers.31 32

The polyps were classified according to morphology into low-dysplasia adenomas (LDAs), high-dysplasia adenomas (HDAs), sessile-serrated polyps (SSPs), and hyperplastic polyps (HPs). The polyps and adenocarcinomas were stratified into low- and high-grade lesions. The expression of the parkin and APC proteins was determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides.

Tissue Microarray and IHC

Tissue microarray (TMA) construction was performed at the Laboratory of Experimental Pathology of Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR). We used archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues to obtain cores measuring 3 mm in diameter. Histological slides were used to select areas with a better representation of the neoplastic tissue. The cores were then transferred to a recipient TMA paraffin block. Microsections were cut from the block to prepare hematoxylin-eosin and IHC slides. For the IHC, the slides were subjected to antigen retrieval with the Target Retrieval Solution (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and then incubated with the following monoclonal antibodies: antiparkin antibody (mouse; 1:100; Abcam Limited, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and anti-APC antibody (mouse; 1:200; Abcam Limited). A disclosure polymer (Spring Bioscience Corp., Pleasanton, CA, United States) was used as a secondary antibody. Slides were incubated with the diaminobenzidine complex and substrate and then counterstained with Harris hematoxylin. Positive and negative controls were included in the IHC analysis for each antibody. The slides were analyzed by an experienced pathologist.28

Morphometric Analysis of Parkin and APC

Parkin and APC protein expression was evaluated according to IHC using color morphometry, a quantitative technique that describes the area of protein expression in square micrometers (µm2). For each slide, 3 pictures from each of the 4 image-wide fields were obtained. A BX40 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 40× magnification objective lens and a Dino Eye camera (AnMo Electronics Corporation, Hsinchu City, Taiwan) using DinoCapture 2.0 software (AnMo Electronics Corporation) was used for image capture. The images were optimized using the Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA, United States) software, version 13.0, by removing the stroma, mucin lakes, and white areas. The remaining regions of interest were then analyzed using the Image-Pro Plus (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MA, United States) software with a color morphometric tool using a high-power field (HPF). Figs. 1, 2 show examples of morphometric analysis of colorectal polyps and adenocarcinomas.

Fig. 1 Morphometric analysis of colorectal polyps (x40 magnification). (A) Parkin immunoexpression; (B) APC immunoexpression; (A1,B1) Image optimized with the Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Incorporated) software, version 13.0, after removal of non-interest areas (stroma and mucin lakes), represented in white; (A2,B2) morphometric processing with the representation of non-interest areas in green, areas without protein expression, in yellow, and immunopositivity for immunohistochemical staining, in red.

Fig. 2 Morphometric analysis of colorectal adenocarcinomas (x40 magnification). (A) Parkin immunoexpression; (B) APC immunoexpression; (A1,B1) Image optimized with the Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Incorporated) software, version 13.0, after removal of non-interest areas (stroma and mucin lakes), represented in white; (A2,B2) morphometric processing with the representation of non-interest areas in green, areas without protein expression, in yellow, and immunopositivity for immunohistochemical staining, in red.

Statistical Analysis

Considering that several patients contributed to the study sample with more than one polyp, it was necessary to analyze them within a statistical model that considered the hierarchical data structure to avoid possible analysis biases. To assess the association between clinicopathological parameters and IHC expression, we used a univariate multilevel linear regression model in which polyps were defined as level 1, and patients, as level 2. The significance of the variables was assessed using the Wald test, and the results were presented in terms of coefficient variables within 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). The intraclass correlation coefficient was estimated to assess the composition of the variations in the markers. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to assess the associations among quantitative variables. The Student's t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare IHC markers between the groups. The Student's t-test, the Fisher's exact test, and the Chi-squared test were used for the comparison of groups defined by polyps and adenocarcinomas. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Data were analyzed using the Stata (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, United States) software, version 14.

Results

We included 295 individuals, 222 (75.2%) of whom underwent polypectomy for neoplastic polyps, and 73 (24.7%) underwent colorectal cancer surgery for adenocarcinoma. The clinical characteristics of the sample are summarized in Table 1. Among the 222 (75.2%) individuals who underwent polypectomy, 122 (55%) presented more than 1 polyp. In total, 284 polyps were included in the study. A descriptive analysis of the neoplastic lesions is shown in Table 2.

Clinicopathological characteristics of the study population

Polyp group (N = 222)

Adenocarcinoma group (N = 73)

n

%

n

%

Gender

 Male

122

55

34

46.6

 Female

100

45

39

53.4

Age groups (years)

 ≤ 45

45

20.3

13

17.8

 46–55

58

26.1

12

16.4

 ≥ 56

119

53.6

48

65.8

Number of polyps

 1

100

45

 > 1

122

55

Descriptive analysis of neoplastic lesions

Polyps (N = 284)

Adenocarcinomas (N = 73)

n

%

n

%

Location

 Right colon

121

42.6

18

24.7

 Left colon

163

57.4

55

75.3

Grade

 Low

262

92.3

64

87.7

 High

22

7.7

8

10.9

 Unknown

0

0

1

0.1

Size (mm)

 < 4

68

23.9

 4–10

186

65.5

 > 10

30

10.6

Morphology

 Pediculate

27

9.5

 Sessile

257

90.5

Histology

 LGA

192

67.6

 SSP

25

8.8

 HGD

22

7.7

 HP

45

15.8

Abbreviations: HGD, high-grade dysplasia; HP, hyperplastic polyp; LGA, low-grade adenoma; SSP, sessile serrated polyp.

Parkin and APC expression in high- and low-grade polyps and adenocarcinomas is shown in Table 3. We found a statistically significant difference in parkin expression between the lesions: in low-grade lesions, Parkin expression was higher in adenocarcinomas than in polyps (p < 0.001), and, in high-grade lesions, parkin expression was also higher among adenocarcinomas, although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant difference was found between polyps and adenocarcinomas when comparing low- and high-grade lesions. There was also a statistically significant difference in APC expression between the groups; it was higher in adenocarcinomas than in polyps in low- (p <0.001) and high-grade (p = 0.001) lesions.

Protein expression of parkin and APC according to histology parameters and comparison of histology groups

Mean

Median

SD

p

cLGP

cHGP

cLGA

cHGA

Parkin

 LGP (n = 262)

10.4

9.6

6.1

< 0.001*

0.217

< 0.001*

0.039*

 HGP (n = 22)

12.2

11.3

6.1

0.217

0.005*

0.258

 LGA (n = 64)

16.8

15.1

8.6

< 0.001*

0.005*

0.549

 HGA (n = 8)

15.3

19.8

8.4

0.039*

0.258

0.549

APC

 LGP (n = 240)

18.8

18.3

7.3

< 0.001*

0.608

< 0.001*

< 0.001*

 HGP (n = 17)

20

19.6

7.8

0.608

< 0.001*

0.001*

 LGA (n = 64)

32.4

31.6

14

< 0.001*

< 0.001*

0.817

 HGA (n = 8)

33.2

34.6

16.5

< 0.001*

0.001*

0.817

Abbreviations: c, p-value when compared with; HGA, high-grade adenocarcinoma; HGP, High-grade polyp; LGA, low-grade adenocarcinoma; LGP, low-grade polyp; SD, standard deviation. Note: * p < 0.05 (analysis of variance, ANOVA).

The results of the univariate multilevel linear regression for the comparison of protein expression showed that adenocarcinomas had a significantly higher expression of parkin (6.19; 95%CI: 4.43–9.95; p < 0.001) (Fig. 3A) and APC (13.5; 95%CI: 11–15.9; p < 0.001) (Fig. 3B) than polyps. Among the colorectal polyps, a positive correlation was found between parkin and APC expression (0.23; p <0.001).

Fig. 3 Multilevel analysis of the combined effect of polyp/adenocarcinoma and the degree of differentiation of (A) parkin protein and (B) APC protein, showing in both graphics a significant (p < 0.001) lower expression in low- and high-grade polyps compared with adenocarcinomas. We can also observe a higher expression of parkin in high-grade polyps and in low-grade adenocarcinomas, as well as a higher expression of APC in high-grade polyps and adenocarcinomas.

Discussion

We demonstrated a significant correlation between parkin and APC expressions in polyps and adenocarcinomas. Previous research24 found that the deletion or alteration in the PARK2 gene is intrinsically related to a deficiency in the expression of the APC gene, both of which cooperate to accelerate tumor progression. Accelerated adenoma progression and multiplicity in APC were found in mutant mice when PARK2 knockout was present compared with those with an isolated APC mutation.24 However, isolated parkin loss did not lead to adenoma development.24 This suggests that PARK2 loss plays an additive role in CRC development but is insufficient if not accompanied by other key genetic events. Genomic analyses24 revealed a deficiency in PARK2 expression in approximately one-third of sporadic CRC cases, and PARK2 deficiency was found to be associated with APC deficiency.

This positive correlation was also found in another study26 that observed higher expressions of the APC and parkin proteins in tumor and normal tissues respectively. Both studies24 26 suggested that initial APC suppression can influence subsequent changes in parkin expression, which may be another mechanism by which parkin could be involved in cancer pathophysiology. Therefore, the tissue expression of parkin in colorectal polyps and adenocarcinomas is consistent with the expression of APC, a protein that is better established as a tumor suppressor. Regarding its role in the Vogelstein8 tumor progression model, the APC mutation is admitted as an initial event in tumors of the “classic” pathway, that is, in the left colon. Thereafter, a sequence of events occurs at different stages of the evolution of a polyp until it accumulates enough mutations to present dysplasia, which will invariably progress to carcinoma. We suggest that, in the initial stages of the Volgestein model, parkin has a tumor suppressor function, acting in conjunction with APC.

In addition, we observed a higher immunoexpression of parkin and APC in (high- and low-grade) adenocarcinomas than in polyps (with high- and low-grade dysplasia). There are no previous studies showing overexpression of such proteins in adenocarcinomas compared with neoplastic polyps. This suggests that, as a neoplastic polyp dedifferentiates toward the formation of adenocarcinoma, the expressions of parkin and APC increase, in contrast to what we initially expected. As both are products of tumor suppressor genes, when mutated, we expected that they would favor neoplastic evolution, thus being expressed in progressively smaller amounts. However, this assumption was not confirmed by the results observed. In fact, after the multilevel analysis with four subgroups of polyps and carcinomas, we confirmed that there was a greater expression of parkin and APC in the group of adenocarcinomas than in the polyp groups. Likewise, when analyzing the multilevel hierarchical structure for APC immunoexpression, a higher expression of this protein was identified in polyps, which is expected in the classic pathway of the carcinogenesis model. Thus, corroborating previous findings,29 the results observed with these markers may be associated with the progression of precursor lesions to colorectal cancer. A recent study25 reported high parkin expression in colonic polyps. On the other hand, other studies26 27 found lower PARK2 expression in adenocarcinomas than in normal tissue, and lower parkin protein expression levels in adenocarcinomas than in adjacent normal tissue.26 However, as in the current study we did not compare the results with normal tissue and polyps may eventually show alterations, the results may suggest that the eventual mutation of these genes, which leads to an expected reduction in their expression in the first events of the classic pathway, paradoxically results in a subsequent increase in expression when the cell becomes malignant and has a high potential for tumor invasion and aggressiveness (poorly differentiated neoplasms). Thus, analyzing the expression of parkin transversally, it could be increased in normal tissue, decreased in polyps, and again increased in adenocarcinomas, trying to contain tumor progression, but with expression still below the levels found in normal tissue.

Another alternative is that parkin mediates mitochondrial mitophagy. Mitochondrial damage caused by changes in tumor cells can lead to increased generation of reactive oxygen species and alterations in membrane potential. Parkin ensures mitochondrial homeostasis by inducing mitophagy in damaged mitochondria through an increase in the BAX/BCL-2 ratio. Thus, it protects cells from apoptosis and contributes to cell viability and consequent tumor progression.33 In an antagonistic manner, high levels of parkin in adenocarcinomas could contribute to tumor progression, resulting in increased expression accompanied by tumor progression.

However, it is important to note that the immunohistochemical analysis performed did not enable us to investigate whether the expressed protein was functional. Additional studies are needed to identify the functionality of this protein.

Therefore, we conclude that parkin and APC have a similar biological behavior in tumor suppression, but with a tendency towards a “de novo” increase in their expression as the neoplastic cell advances in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. These findings indicate that parkin and APC may be involved in the late mechanisms of tumor progression control in the carcinogenesis pathway.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Authors

About the Journal

Journal: Brazilian Journal of Oncology

DOI: 10.1055/s-00059887

e-issn: 2526-8732

Publisher: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.

Publisher address: Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

No citations found for this article.

References

1. Siegel, R L and Miller, K D and Goding Sauer, A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin [online]. 2020, vol. 70, p. 145-164. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21601 Ver referência

2. Edwards, B K and Ward, E and Kohler, B A. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer [online]. 2010, vol. 116, p. 544-573. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24760 Ver referência

3. Sung, H and Ferlay, J and Siegel, R L. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin [online]. 2021, vol. 71, p. 209-249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 Ver referência

4. Weitz, J and Koch, M and Debus, J and Höhler, T and Galle, P R and Büchler, M W. Colorectal cancer. Lancet [online]. 2005, vol. 365, p. 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17706-X Ver referência

5. Fearon, E R and Vogelstein, B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell [online]. 1990, vol. 61, p. 759-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-I Ver referência

6. Rowan, A J and Lamlum, H and Ilyas, M. APC mutations in sporadic colorectal tumors: A mutational “hotspot” and interdependence of the “two hits”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [online]. 2000, vol. 97, p. 3352-3357. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.7.3352 Ver referência

7. Zhang, L and Shay, J W. Multiple Roles of APC and its Therapeutic Implications in Colorectal Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst [online]. 2017, vol. 109, p. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djw332 Ver referência

8. Vogelstein, B and Fearon, E R and Hamilton, S R. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med [online]. 1988, vol. 319, p. 525-532. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198809013190901 Ver referência

9. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature [online]. 2012, vol. 487, p. 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11252 Ver referência

10. Senft, D and Qi, J and Ronai, Z A. Ubiquitin ligases in oncogenic transformation and cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer [online]. 2018, vol. 18, p. 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.105 Ver referência

11. Kumar, A and Aguirre, J D and Condos, T E. Disruption of the autoinhibited state primes the E3 ligase parkin for activation and catalysis. EMBO J [online]. 2015, vol. 34, p. 2506-2521. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201592337 Ver referência

12. Chakraborty, J and Basso, V and Ziviani, E. Post translational modification of Parkin. Biol Direct [online]. 2017, vol. 12, p. 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-017-0176-3 Ver referência

13. Xu, L and Lin, D C and Yin, D and Koeffler, H P. An emerging role of PARK2 in cancer. J Mol Med (Berl) [online]. 2014, vol. 92, p. 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-013-1107-0 Ver referência

14. Gupta, A and Anjomani-Virmouni, S and Koundouros, N and Poulogiannis, G. [object Object]. Mol Cell Oncol [online]. 2017, vol. 4, p. e1329692. https://doi.org/10.1080/23723556.2017.1329692 Ver referência

15. Denison, S R and Wang, F and Becker, N A. Alterations in the common fragile site gene Parkin in ovarian and other cancers. Oncogene [online]. 2003, vol. 22, p. 8370-8378. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207072 Ver referência

16. Zhang, C and Lin, M and Wu, R. Parkin, a p53 target gene, mediates the role of p53 in glucose metabolism and the Warburg effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [online]. 2011, vol. 108, p. 16259-16264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1113884108 Ver referência

17. Yeo, C WS and Ng, F SL and Chai, C. Parkin pathway activation mitigates glioma cell proliferation and predicts patient survival. Cancer Res [online]. 2012, vol. 72, p. 2543-2553. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3060 Ver referência

18. Veeriah, S and Taylor, B S and Meng, S. Somatic mutations of the Parkinson's disease-associated gene PARK2 in glioblastoma and other human malignancies. Nat Genet [online]. 2010, vol. 42, p. 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.491 Ver referência

19. Agirre, X and Román-Gómez, J and Vázquez, I. Abnormal methylation of the common PARK2 and PACRG promoter is associated with downregulation of gene expression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia. Int J Cancer [online]. 2006, vol. 118, p. 1945-1953. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21584 Ver referência

20. Picchio, M C and Martin, E S and Cesari, R. Alterations of the tumor suppressor gene Parkin in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res [online]. 2004, vol. 10, p. 2720-2724. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0086 Ver referência

21. Duan, H and Lei, Z and Xu, F. PARK2 suppresses proliferation and tumorigenicity in non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol [online]. 2019, vol. 9, p. 790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00790 Ver referência

22. Wang, F and Denison, S and Lai, J P. Parkin gene alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer [online]. 2004, vol. 40, p. 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.20020 Ver referência

23. Fujiwara, M and Marusawa, H and Wang, H Q. Parkin as a tumor suppressor gene for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene [online]. 2008, vol. 27, p. 6002-6011. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.199 Ver referência

24. Poulogiannis, G and McIntyre, R E and Dimitriadi, M. PARK2 deletions occur frequently in sporadic colorectal cancer and accelerate adenoma development in Apc mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [online]. 2010, vol. 107, p. 15145-15150. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009941107 Ver referência

25. Kühl Svoboda Baldin, R and Austrália Paredes Marcondes Ribas, C and de Noronha, L. Expression of Parkin, APC, APE1, and Bcl-xL in Colorectal Polyps. J Histochem Cytochem [online]. 2021, vol. 69, p. 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1369/00221554211026296 Ver referência

26. da Silva-Camargo, C CV and Svoboda Baldin, R K and Costacurta Polli, N L. Parkin protein expression and its impact on survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Med [online]. 2018, vol. 15, p. 61-69. https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2017.0136 Ver referência

27. Bhat, Z I and Kumar, B and Bansal, S. Association of PARK2 promoter polymorphisms and methylation with colorectal cancer in North Indian population. Gene [online]. 2019, vol. 682, p. 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.10.010 Ver referência

28. Baldin, R KS and Júnior, R AA and Azevedo, M. Interobserver variability in histological diagnosis of serrated colorectal polyps. J Coloproctol (Rio J) [online]. 2015, vol. 35, p. 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcol.2015.06.008 Ver referência

29. Anselmi Júnior, R A and Souza, CMde and Azevedo, MLVde and Montemor Netto, M R and Baldin, R KS and Sebastião, A PM and Soares, LFdeP and Tullio, L F and Noronha, Lde. The role of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) and cycloxygenase-2 (COX2) in carcinogenesis of colorectal polyps. J Coloproctol (Rio J) [online]. 2018, vol. 38, p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcol.2017.08.005 Ver referência

30. Umar, A and Boland, C R and Terdiman, J P. Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst [online]. 2004, vol. 96, p. 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh034 Ver referência

31. Bustamante-Lopez, L A and Nahas, S C and Nahas, C SR and Pinto, R A and Marques, C FS and Cecconello, I. Is there a difference between right- versus left-sided colon cancers? Does side make any difference in long-term follow-up? ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo). [online]. 2019, vol. 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020190001e1479 Ver referência

32. Meguid, R A and Slidell, M B and Wolfgang, C L and Chang, D C and Ahuja, N. Is there a difference in survival between right- versus left-sided colon cancers?. Ann Surg Oncol [online]. 2008, vol. 15, p. 2388-2394. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0015-y Ver referência

33. Mao, L and Liu, H and Zhang, R. PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy inhibits warangalone-induced mitochondrial apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Aging (Albany NY) [online]. 2021, vol. 13, p. 12955-12972. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.202965 Ver referência

Article images

See where this article was accessed

Dados de acesso insuficientes para visualização no mapa.